Freddoso (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1980), Reprinted: South Bend, IN: St.
Freddoso and Henry Schuurman and introduced by Alfred J. * "Ockham's Theory of Propositions": Part II of the Summa Logicae, translated by Alfred J. These 37 chapters are a systematic exposition of Aristotle's Topics. These 41 chapters are a systematic exposition of Aristotle's Posterior Analytics. (iv) On syllogisms containing exponible propositions (iii) On hypothetical propositions (30-7) (ii) On the conversion of propositions (21-9) (iv) Chapters 63-77 onwards deal with the theory of supposition. The later chapters deal with the ten Categories themselves, as follows: Substance (42-3), Quantity (44-9), Relation (50-4), Quality (55-6), Action (57), Passion (58), Time (59), Place (60), Position (61), Habit (62). The first chapters of this section concern definition and description, the notions of subject and predicate, the meaning of terms like 'whole', 'being' and so on. (iii) Chapters 26-62 deal with the Categories of Aristotle, known to the medieval philosophers as the 'Praedicamenta'. (ii) Chapters 18-25 deal with the five predicables of Porphyry. Ockham also introduces the issue of universals here. (i) Chapters 1-17 deal with terms: what they are, and how they are divide into categorematic, abstract and concrete, absolute and connotative, 'first intention' and 'second intention'. The nominalists of the fifteenth century (such as Swineshead, Heytesbury, Gerson and D'Ailly) looked upon him as the founder of their school. This work is important in that it contains the main account of Ockham's nominalism. These headings, though often given in a different order, represent the basic arrangement of all scholastic textbooks. Systematically, it resembles other works of medieval logic, organised under the basic headings of the Aristotelian Predicables, Categories, terms, propositions, and syllogisms. A translation of Summa Logicae III-II: De Syllogismo Demonstrativo, with selections from the Prologue to the Ordinatio.The "Summa Logicae" is a textbook on logic by William of Ockham. Longeway, John Lee (2007), Demonstration and Scientific Knowledge in William of Ockham, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press. Ockham's Theory of Propositions: Part II of the Summa logicae. Complete Translation.įreddoso, Alfred J., and Schuurman, Henry, trans. Ockham's Theory of Terms: Part I of the Summa Logicae. Note that the whole work has never been fully translated into English, Ockham’s own language. Personally I would stick to the published translations in English – see below. not just in Latin but in a written form of Latin which is difficult to read without training. I am not sure you would want these, however, as they will look something like this I.e. de la Ville 498 (1340) and Avignon, Bibl.
Sum of logic ockham pdf full#
I don’t have the full list of all the ms used for the critical edition, although two of them were: Bruges, Bibl. 899 p., eds Boehner, Philotheus, Gál, Gedeon, Brown, Stephen). Editiones Instituti Franciscani Universitatis S. The first critical edition of the Summa was published in 1974 as the first volume of Opera Philosophica (St. Rather than rely on the old 15th century printed works and other editions copied from them, you go back to the original manuscript sources, and compare them together to look for copying errors, with the aim of finding out what the author ‘really’ said. There is also the concept of a ‘critical edition’. The concept of an ‘edition’ arrived with printing, when instead of writing a copy, you do a lot of work to set the type and get everything just right, then you publish with a large print run, and keep on printing until you decide on the need for a second edition. handwritten) form, so there is no sense in which there was an ‘original first edition’. Until the 15th century, all such works were published in manuscript (i.e. Do you know any links or libraries or museims, where I can find it?” You say: “But I can't find any scans or photos of the original handmade manuscript or the original (first) edition. The essay by Peter King that you link to is a short ‘summary’ of the work. ‘Summa’ is difficult to translate in English – it doesn’t really mean ‘summary’. The book is generally known by its Latin title, Summa Logicae.
Don’t trust anything that Wikipedia says, or at least, be cautious. First ‘Sum of logic’ is the Wikipedia title.
0 kommentar(er)
